MENU

Drive for Muscularity

[vc_row fullwidth=”true”][vc_column][mk_divider style=”thin_solid” thin_single_color=”#e2e2e2″ thickness=”4″ margin_top=”0″ margin_bottom=”65″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][mk_fancy_title strip_tags=”true” style=”true” color=”#393836″ size=”20″ font_weight=”400″ font_style=”normal” txt_transform=”uppercase” letter_spacing=”1″ margin_bottom=”0″ font_family=”none” align=”center”][xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Title”][/mk_fancy_title][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text disable_pattern=”false” el_class=”.padtop “][xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Description”]
[xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Tags”][/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][mk_divider style=”thin_solid” thin_single_color=”#ededed” margin_top=”5″ margin_bottom=”30″][mk_fancy_title strip_tags=”true” color=”#4bc19d” size=”18″ font_weight=”bold” txt_transform=”uppercase” margin_top=”-10″ margin_bottom=”-20″ font_family=”none” el_class=”.grn-txt”]

ITEMS:

[/mk_fancy_title][vc_column_text disable_pattern=”false”][xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Items”][/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_raw_html][/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text][xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Psych”][/vc_column_text][mk_padding_divider size=”30″][vc_column_text][xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Categories”][/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][mk_divider style=”thin_solid” thin_single_color=”#ededed” margin_top=”5″ margin_bottom=”30″][mk_fancy_title strip_tags=”true” color=”#4bc19d” size=”18″ font_weight=”bold” txt_transform=”uppercase” margin_top=”-10″ margin_bottom=”-20″ font_family=”none” el_class=”.grn-txt”]

Scoring Procedures:

[/mk_fancy_title][vc_column_text disable_pattern=”false”][xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Scoring”][/vc_column_text][vc_column_text disable_pattern=”false”]

PRIMARY CITATION:

McCreary, D. R., & Sasse, D. K. (2000). An exploration of the drive for muscularity in adolescent boys and girls. Journal of American College Health, 48(6), 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480009596271

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][mk_divider style=”thin_solid” thin_single_color=”#ededed” margin_top=”5″ margin_bottom=”30″][/vc_column][/vc_row][mk_page_section section_id=”scoring” sidebar=”sidebar-1″][vc_column][mk_fancy_title strip_tags=”true” color=”#4bc19d” size=”18″ font_weight=”bold” txt_transform=”uppercase” margin_top=”-10″ margin_bottom=”-20″ font_family=”none” el_class=”.grn-txt”]

Psychometric Score:

[/mk_fancy_title][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2/3″][vc_column_text][xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Psych-Viz”][/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_column_text][xyz-ips snippet=”Measure-Scores”][/vc_column_text][mk_padding_divider size=”10″][vc_column_text]

For more details, see Scoring Methodology

[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html][/vc_raw_html][mk_fancy_title strip_tags=”true” color=”#4bc19d” size=”18″ font_weight=”bold” txt_transform=”uppercase” margin_top=”-30″ margin_bottom=”-20″ font_family=”none” align=”center” el_class=”.grn-txt”][/mk_fancy_title][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text disable_pattern=”false”]

For Scoring Details View Scoring Methodology Page

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/mk_page_section][vc_row][vc_column][mk_divider][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text][xyz-ips snippet=”Warning-Description”][/vc_column_text][vc_column_text][/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][mk_padding_divider size=”100″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Women’s Decision Making-Yemen

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Women’s Decision Making-Ecuador

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Women’s Decision Making-Uganda

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Modified Worksite Harassment Tool

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale (CMAS) – Revised

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Women’s Autonomy and Subjective Well-Being

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Adolescent Future Expectations Scale for Parents (AFES-p)

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Sex Role Stereotypical Victim Blame Attributions Scale (BLAME)

Categories

Geographies Tested:

Populations Included:

Age Range:

Items:

Scoring Procedures

Original Citation


Psychometric Score

Ease of Use Score

Scoring breakdown

Formative Research

Qualitative Research

Existing Literature/Theoretical Framework

Field Expert Input

Cognitive Interviews / Pilot Testing

Reliability

Internal

Test-retest

Interrater

Validity

Content

Face

Criterion (gold-standard)

Construct

KEY

Ease of Use

Readability

Scoring Clarity

Length

Join the EMERGE Community

to get the latest updates on new measures and guidance for survey researchers